> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase35-session03-runtime-accessibility-controls/implementation_summary.md). # Implementation Summary **Session ID**: `phase35-session03-runtime-accessibility-controls` **Completed**: 2026-06-26 **Duration**: 1 hour *** ## Overview Session 03 completed the AI Rogue runtime accessibility controls pass. The session preserved and proved dynamic assistive runtime summaries, compact Inspect and Next target controls, keyboard command behavior, Large HUD Labels preference propagation, and mobile no-overflow route behavior. The only production source repair was a RuntimeCanvas preference replay after async controller mount so persisted Large HUD settings cannot be lost during mount/load races. *** ## Deliverables ### Files Created | File | Purpose | Lines | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ----- | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session03-runtime-accessibility-controls/spec.md` | Session scope and success criteria | 347 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session03-runtime-accessibility-controls/tasks.md` | 20-task implementation checklist | 76 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session03-runtime-accessibility-controls/implementation-notes.md` | Evidence ledger and task notes | 869 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session03-runtime-accessibility-controls/code-review.md` | Review findings and repair evidence | 75 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session03-runtime-accessibility-controls/security-compliance.md` | Security and GDPR review | 85 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session03-runtime-accessibility-controls/validation.md` | Validation report | 259 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session03-runtime-accessibility-controls/IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md` | updateprd session summary | \~90 | ### Files Modified | File | Changes | | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `src/extensions/ai-rogue/views/runtime-canvas.tsx` | Replays latest preferences after async runtime mount and preserves assistive summary cleanup paths. | | `src/extensions/ai-rogue/__tests__/runtime-canvas.test.tsx` | Adds positive coverage for preference replay, compact command duplicate prevention, keyboard command mapping, reset/load summary cleanup, and unavailable status copy. | | `src/extensions/ai-rogue/__tests__/client.test.tsx` | Adds Large HUD Labels Settings persistence, pending-state, failure rollback, and busy-state coverage. | | `src/extensions/ai-rogue/runtime/__tests__/render-model.test.ts` | Adds bounded Large HUD projection and deterministic summary coverage. | | `tests/e2e/ai-rogue-mobile.spec.ts` | Adds mobile Play compact controls, Large HUD, dynamic summary, and Play/Ledger/Loadout/Settings no-overflow checks. | *** ## Technical Decisions 1. **Preserve the existing command union**: Compact controls continue to use existing `inspect` and `target-next` commands instead of adding new runtime actions. 2. **Repair only the observed mount race**: RuntimeCanvas was changed to replay latest preferences after async controller mount; Settings, render-model, and renderer source paths already satisfied the contract. 3. **Keep diagnostics out of primary UI**: Runtime event evidence remains hidden or test-only while visible surfaces stay product-facing. *** ## Test Results | Metric | Value | | -------- | ------------------- | | Tests | 4,350 | | Passed | 4,350 | | Coverage | N/A - not generated | Additional gates: * `bun run test` - PASS, 4,345 Vitest tests * Focused AI Rogue Vitest - PASS, 53 tests * `bunx playwright test tests/e2e/ai-rogue-mobile.spec.ts` - PASS, 5 Chromium tests * `bun run typecheck` - PASS * `bun run lint` - PASS * `bun run lint:md` - PASS * `bun run format:check` - PASS * `git diff --check HEAD` - PASS *** ## Lessons Learned 1. Preference propagation can regress when the runtime controller mounts asynchronously; coverage now guards the post-mount replay path. 2. Large HUD behavior needs proof across Settings persistence, render-model projection, runtime preference updates, and narrow mobile routes. *** ## Future Considerations Items for future sessions: 1. Preserve the runtime preference replay contract during renderer and React bridge refactors. 2. Keep the mobile no-overflow route checks active when persistence and world type cleanup work changes AI Rogue surfaces. *** ## Session Statistics * **Tasks**: 20 completed * **Files Created**: 7 * **Files Modified**: 5 * **Tests Added**: 10+ * **Blockers**: 0 resolved --- # Agent Instructions This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com. ## Querying This Documentation If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question. Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter: ``` GET https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase35-session03-runtime-accessibility-controls/implementation_summary.md?ask=&goal= ``` `ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language. `goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal. The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation. Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.