> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase35-session02-fixed-blocker-regression-coverage/implementation_summary.md). # Implementation Summary **Session ID**: `phase35-session02-fixed-blocker-regression-coverage` **Completed**: 2026-06-26 **Duration**: 2-4 hours *** ## Overview Session 02 locked the fixed AI Rogue default-enable blocker contracts behind direct regression evidence. The session mapped every owned blocker family to current behavior-owned coverage, reran the full and focused gates, and validated that no new source, route, dependency, runtime, UI, hosted, or public-demo behavior was required. *** ## Deliverables ### Files Created | File | Purpose | Lines | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | ----- | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session02-fixed-blocker-regression-coverage/spec.md` | Session 02 planning contract | \~334 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session02-fixed-blocker-regression-coverage/tasks.md` | Completed 22-task checklist | \~78 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session02-fixed-blocker-regression-coverage/implementation-notes.md` | Coverage map, command evidence, and routing ledger | \~851 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session02-fixed-blocker-regression-coverage/code-review.md` | Review and repair record | \~67 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session02-fixed-blocker-regression-coverage/security-compliance.md` | Security and GDPR compliance review | \~77 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session02-fixed-blocker-regression-coverage/validation.md` | Validation report and gate evidence | \~215 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase35-session02-fixed-blocker-regression-coverage/IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md` | Update PRD closeout summary | \~100 | ### Files Modified | File | Changes | | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | `.spec_system/PRD/phase_35/PRD_phase_35.md` | Marked Session 02 complete, updated progress to 2/10, and recorded regression coverage results plus routing. | | `.spec_system/state.json` | Marked Session 02 completed, cleared current session, and appended completed session history. | | `package.json` | Bumped patch version from 0.5.43 to 0.5.44. | | `README.md` | Updated the displayed version to 0.5.44. | *** ## Technical Decisions 1. **Preserve existing direct coverage**: The current tests already cover every Session 02 blocker family, so adding duplicate assertions would increase maintenance without improving confidence. 2. **Keep the session evidence-only**: No application source changed because validation proved the existing contracts already satisfy the fixed-blocker scope. 3. **Route deeper hardening forward**: Platform-failure, storage-failure, accessibility-control, and refactor work remains assigned to later Phase 35 sessions. *** ## Test Results | Metric | Value | | -------- | ------------------------------------ | | Tests | 4,356 | | Passed | 4,356 | | Coverage | Not collected by validation commands | Validation evidence included full Vitest, focused AI Rogue Playwright checks, typecheck, lint, Prettier, Markdown lint, JSON validation, privacy/capability scan, security review, ASCII, LF, and deliverable checks. All recorded gates passed. *** ## Lessons Learned 1. Fixed blocker closeouts benefit from an evidence-only session before broad refactors resume. 2. Behavior-owned tests already provide stable anchors for lethal DOT, scenario gating, assistive summaries, feedback sprites, durable claims, and durable saved-run hydration. 3. Later hardening sessions should preserve these anchors while adding only the missing platform and persistence failure coverage. *** ## Future Considerations Items for future sessions: 1. Session 03 should continue with runtime accessibility controls. 2. Session 04 should own renderer platform-failure and scheduling hardening. 3. Session 05 should own deeper persistence schema contracts and feasible storage failure harnesses. 4. Sessions 06-08 should preserve the verified contracts during refactors. *** ## Session Statistics * **Tasks**: 22 completed * **Files Created**: 7 * **Files Modified**: 4 * **Tests Added**: 0 * **Blockers**: 0 resolved --- # Agent Instructions This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com. ## Querying This Documentation If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question. Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter: ``` GET https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase35-session02-fixed-blocker-regression-coverage/implementation_summary.md?ask=&goal= ``` `ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language. `goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal. The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation. Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.