> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase34-session08-default-enablement-evidence-closeout/spec.md).

# Session Specification

**Session ID**: `phase34-session08-default-enablement-evidence-closeout` **Phase**: 34 - AI Rogue Audit Remediation **Status**: Not Started **Created**: 2026-06-26

***

## 1. Session Overview

This session closes Phase 34 by rerunning the complete AI Rogue and public-demo gate matrix, reconciling the audit and enablement documents with Sessions 01 through 07, and publishing the renewed default-enablement recommendation. It is next because the analysis script reported Phase 34 active, no current session, Sessions 01 through 07 completed, and Session 08 as the only unfinished current-phase candidate.

The work does not add new product features or flip AI Rogue to default-enabled. It determines whether the remediation evidence supports a Go, No-Go, or conditional Go recommendation, then records that recommendation with exact gate evidence and any remaining blocker IDs.

The session also preserves the Phase 34 privacy posture. The original audit promoted no D3 finding for network capability, collectors, hosted storage, public-demo server writes, raw private LiveData rendering, raw private persistence, or seed-share leaks. Closeout must prove that posture still holds after the remediation sessions.

***

## 2. Objectives

1. Rerun and record the full Phase 34 closeout gate set.
2. Reconcile AI Rogue audit findings with the remediation evidence from Sessions 01 through 07.
3. Publish a renewed default-enablement recommendation with exact blocker status.
4. Update security, compliance, PRD, and current AI Rogue docs so they agree on the final Phase 34 posture.

***

## 3. Prerequisites

### Required Sessions

* [x] `phase34-session01-characterization-test-harness` - Provides baseline characterization coverage for the audited blockers and refactor seams.
* [x] `phase34-session02-accessibility-and-compact-input` - Provides dynamic assistive runtime summary, compact input, and Large HUD remediation.
* [x] `phase34-session03-simulation-correctness-and-scenario-gate` - Provides lethal turn-start command consistency and product-route scenario gating.
* [x] `phase34-session04-renderer-lifecycle-and-robustness` - Provides transient sprite bounds, resize coalescing, media-query fallback, and setup/audio fallback remediation.
* [x] `phase34-session05-runtime-api-ownership` - Provides narrower runtime mount/API ownership and simulation-owned pre-run mutation paths.
* [x] `phase34-session06-persistence-schema-contracts` - Provides schema-owned durable claim and saved-run hydration contracts.
* [x] `phase34-session07-render-performance-and-audio-docs` - Provides renderer projection cache evidence and current audio/media docs.

### Required Tools Or Knowledge

* Phase 34 source of truth in `.spec_system/PRD/phase_34/PRD_phase_34.md`.
* AI Rogue audit findings in `.spec_system/PRD/phase_35/PRD_phase_35.md`.
* AI Rogue enablement decision docs in `docs/extensions/ai-rogue/enablement-decision.md`.
* AI Rogue runtime, persistence, route, and public-demo tests under `src/extensions/ai-rogue/` and `tests/e2e/`.
* Gate scripts in `package.json`, `scripts/check-bundle-budget.sh`, `scripts/check-asset-sizes.sh`, `scripts/check-private-runtime-artifacts.sh`, and `scripts/ai-rogue-playthrough.ts`.

### Environment Requirements

* Bun 1.3.14 project tooling.
* Local Playwright Chromium availability for the `chromium` and `pages-demo-chromium` projects.
* No Cloudflare dashboard action or deployment is required.
* No new dependencies, assets, collectors, hosted writes, analytics, remote loading, or default-enable switch changes are required.

***

## 4. Scope

### In Scope (MVP)

* Re-run and record `typecheck`, script typecheck, lint, format, unit, focused AI Rogue unit, host extension tests, build, bundle budget, asset-size, private-runtime, AI Rogue e2e, Pages build, Pages scan, Pages budget, Pages route smoke, Pages mobile route smoke, and deterministic playthrough gates.
* Confirm no `/__*` bridge calls, hosted writes, collectors, analytics, Functions, remote game-content loading, raw private telemetry, private path leaks, or unreviewed persistence paths were introduced.
* Update AI Rogue audit findings with remediation status for the default- enablement blockers and any remaining non-go conditions.
* Update AI Rogue enablement docs with a renewed Phase 34 recommendation: Go, No-Go, or conditional Go with named conditions.
* Update security/compliance posture and Phase 34 PRD notes with the closeout result and evidence source.
* Record exact pass/fail evidence and blocker IDs in the session implementation notes.

### Out Of Scope (Deferred)

* Flipping AI Rogue default enablement - Reason: the Phase 34 PRD says this phase prepares a recommendation and does not default-enable AI Rogue by default.
* New AI Rogue product features - Reason: this session is closeout evidence and documentation reconciliation only.
* Broad runtime refactors - Reason: Sessions 01 through 07 already handled the remediation prerequisites assigned to this phase.
* Cloudflare Pages deployment - Reason: the session stub excludes deployment unless needed for proof, and the closeout gate can use local Pages build, scan, budget, and route smoke.
* Adding CI gates for Pages demo release checks - Reason: the current phase records local gate evidence; CI coverage remains a separate follow-up unless explicitly scoped later.

***

## 5. Technical Approach

### Architecture

Treat the session as an evidence and release-posture closeout. Start by mapping every Phase 34 remediation session to the finding IDs it addressed, then rerun the gates that prove those fixes still hold together. Record both the command result and the interpretation: whether the gate supports default enablement, supports only explicit opt-in, or creates a named blocker.

Keep product code changes out of scope unless a gate reveals a small documentation or test-invocation repair that is necessary to record accurate evidence. Product behavior failures should become exact blocker IDs and follow-up scope rather than hidden feature work in the closeout session.

For docs, update current maintained records instead of rewriting historical session evidence. `folded Phase 35 PRD source` should preserve original finding context while adding remediation status and final recommendation. `enablement- decision.md` should keep the Phase 30 opt-in record and append the Phase 34 renewed recommendation. Security/compliance docs should continue to separate product quality blockers from security or GDPR findings.

### Design Patterns

* Evidence ledger: one table of commands/checks with result, evidence, and interpretation.
* Historical preservation: keep old audit facts visible and add current remediation status instead of deleting the record.
* Recommendation contract: state Go, No-Go, or conditional Go with exact blocker IDs and conditions.
* Static public-demo boundary: validate browser-local state and no local bridge requests through Pages build, scan, budget, and route smoke.

***

## 6. Deliverables

### Files To Create

| File                                                                                                | Purpose                                                          | Est. Lines |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- |
| `.spec_system/specs/phase34-session08-default-enablement-evidence-closeout/implementation-notes.md` | Gate evidence, finding-status map, recommendation, and blockers. | \~220      |

### Files To Modify

| File                                                      | Changes                                                                              | Est. Lines |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------- |
| `.spec_system/PRD/phase_35/PRD_phase_35.md`               | Add Phase 34 remediation status, closeout gate table, and renewed verdict.           | \~120      |
| `docs/extensions/ai-rogue/enablement-decision.md`         | Append Phase 34 recommendation, required evidence, conditions, and posture.          | \~100      |
| `docs/extensions/ai-rogue/README.md`                      | Update closeout posture and document map language to reference the renewed decision. | \~25       |
| `docs/extensions/ai-rogue/runtime-data-and-enablement.md` | Refresh checked date and enablement verification anchors for the closeout evidence.  | \~35       |
| `.spec_system/SECURITY-COMPLIANCE.md`                     | Record Phase 34 closeout security/GDPR posture and gate evidence summary.            | \~80       |
| `.spec_system/PRD/phase_34/PRD_phase_34.md`               | Add Session 08 closeout evidence notes and final recommendation source.              | \~80       |

***

## 7. Success Criteria

### Functional Requirements

* [ ] Complete closeout gate table exists with exact commands, results, and evidence.
* [ ] AR-D6-001, AR-D2-001, AR-D1-002, and AR-D4-001 are marked fixed with evidence or carried as explicit No-Go blockers.
* [ ] Audit findings preserve original context and add current remediation status instead of discarding history.
* [ ] Enablement decision states Go, No-Go, or conditional Go with named conditions and no ambiguous default-enable language.
* [ ] Security/compliance posture distinguishes product quality blockers from security or GDPR findings.
* [ ] AI Rogue remains explicit opt-in unless a later product action changes configuration outside this session.

### Testing Requirements

* [ ] Static quality gates pass or exact blockers are recorded: `bun run typecheck`, `bun run typecheck:scripts`, `bun run lint`, `bun run format:check`, and `git diff --check HEAD`.
* [ ] Unit gates pass or exact blockers are recorded: `bun run test`, `bun run test -- src/extensions/ai-rogue`, and host extension tests.
* [ ] Build and local artifact gates pass or exact blockers are recorded: `bun run build`, `bun run budget:check`, `bash scripts/check-asset-sizes.sh`, and `bun run runtime:check-private`.
* [ ] AI Rogue e2e gates pass or exact blockers are recorded for runtime, mobile, ledger, persistence, and enablement specs.
* [ ] Pages demo gates pass or exact blockers are recorded: `bun run demo:build:pages`, `bun run demo:scan:pages`, `bun run demo:budget:pages`, and Pages route/mobile smoke.
* [ ] `bun run scripts/ai-rogue-playthrough.ts` exits successfully and its seed results are classified without overstating soft-lock evidence.

### Non-Functional Requirements

* [ ] Public-demo AI Rogue remains static/browser-local with no `/__*` bridge requests or hosted mutation requests.
* [ ] No collectors, analytics, Functions, remote game-content loading, or new third-party transfer paths are introduced.
* [ ] No generated private runtime data, private paths, credentials, raw prompts, raw provider bodies, or raw telemetry are committed.
* [ ] Total client JavaScript and Pages demo budgets remain within configured caps or exact overage blockers are recorded.
* [ ] Current docs describe implemented behavior and do not imply unapproved default enablement.

### Quality Gates

* [ ] All files ASCII-encoded.
* [ ] Unix LF line endings.
* [ ] Code and docs follow project conventions.
* [ ] Primary user-facing surfaces contain product-facing copy only.
* [ ] Gate failures are either repaired within closeout-doc scope or recorded as explicit blockers with owner-neutral next-phase scope.

***

## 8. Implementation Notes

### Working Assumptions

* The final recommendation can be recorded without flipping default enablement. Repo evidence: the Phase 34 PRD says the phase does not flip AI Rogue default-enabled by default, and the Session 08 stub lists flipping default enablement as out of scope unless every blocker is closed and the evidence supports that decision. Planning can proceed because a documented recommendation is the required deliverable.
* Local gate evidence is sufficient for this closeout; Cloudflare deployment is not required. Repo evidence: the Session 08 stub excludes Cloudflare deployment unless explicitly needed for proof, while `package.json`, `playwright.config.ts`, and Phase 33/34 records provide local Pages build, scan, budget, route smoke, and mobile smoke gates. Planning can proceed because the required proof is runnable locally.
* The original No-Go audit findings must be reconciled, not overwritten. Repo evidence: Sessions 01 through 07 completed remediation work and validation, while `.spec_system/PRD/phase_35/PRD_phase_35.md` still preserves the original No-Go verdict. Planning can proceed by adding remediation status, final gate evidence, and the renewed recommendation while retaining original finding context.

### Conflict Resolutions

* `.spec_system/PRD/phase_35/PRD_phase_35.md` lists the original No-Go default-enablement blockers, while Phase 34 session summaries report fixes for the major blockers. Chosen interpretation: keep the original findings as historical audit context and add Phase 34 remediation status plus final gate evidence to determine the renewed recommendation.
* `.spec_system/SECURITY-COMPLIANCE.md` reports no open findings, while the AI Rogue audit had No-Go default-enablement blockers. Chosen interpretation: those blockers are accessibility, correctness, lifecycle, performance, and product-readiness issues unless closeout scans reveal a D3 privacy/security issue. Security docs should stay clean or record new findings based on current evidence only.
* Phase 30 `enablement-decision.md` says explicit opt-in and no default enablement, while Phase 34 asks for a renewed recommendation. Chosen interpretation: append a Phase 34 recommendation section rather than rewriting Phase 30 evidence. The current env-gated product posture remains unchanged by this planning session.

### Key Considerations

* Do not hide gate failures behind broad late-session repairs.
* Keep exact command outputs summarized in implementation notes.
* Keep public-demo safety, no-bridge proof, and mobile route smoke bundled.
* Keep documentation language precise about recommendation versus product configuration.
* Preserve unrelated user changes in the working tree.

### Potential Challenges

* Playwright browser availability can block e2e gates: record the exact local browser/tooling blocker if Chromium is unavailable.
* Full gate runtime can be long: run narrow commands in the planned order and record exact pass/fail evidence as each finishes.
* Docs can drift toward approval language: use "recommendation" and "conditions" unless a configuration change is explicitly in scope later.
* Original audit caveats can be lost: keep historical rows and add dated remediation status rather than deleting context.

### Relevant Considerations

* \[P30/P32] **AI Rogue default enablement deferred**: Closeout must publish a recommendation without implying the env gate has changed.
* \[P31-P33] **Pages demo CI guard deferred**: Pages build, scan, budget, route smoke, and no-bridge checks are required local evidence, but CI wiring stays future scope.
* \[P31-P33] **Public-demo release gates stay bundled**: Refresh or verify fixtures, dist scans, budgets, route smoke, hosted metadata assumptions, and no-bridge proof together.
* \[P30] **Opt-in gates catch real issues**: Pair type, lint, format, focused unit/browser tests, build, budget, private-runtime, asset-size, and no-remote checks before widening visibility.
* \[P30/P32] **Do not let docs imply approval or default enablement**: Current docs must separate playable opt-in readiness from any default-on decision.

***

## 9. Testing Strategy

### Unit Tests

* `bun run test` for the full Vitest suite.
* `bun run test -- src/extensions/ai-rogue` for the focused AI Rogue unit and component suite.
* Host extension tests for registry, setup config, settings status, and route behavior: `src/lib/__tests__/extension-registry.test.ts`, `src/lib/__tests__/setup-config-extensions.test.ts`, `src/lib/__tests__/settings-extensions.test.tsx`, and `src/routes/__tests__/extensions-routes.test.tsx`.

### Integration Tests

* `bun run test:e2e -- tests/e2e/ai-rogue-runtime.spec.ts tests/e2e/ai-rogue-mobile.spec.ts tests/e2e/ai-rogue-ledger.spec.ts tests/e2e/ai-rogue-persistence.spec.ts tests/e2e/ai-rogue-enablement.spec.ts --project=chromium`.
* `bun run test:e2e -- tests/e2e/pages-demo-routes.spec.ts tests/e2e/pages-demo-mobile.spec.ts --project=pages-demo-chromium`.

### Runtime Verification

* `bun run build`.
* `bun run demo:build:pages`.
* `bun run demo:scan:pages`.
* `bun run demo:budget:pages`.
* `bun run scripts/ai-rogue-playthrough.ts`.
* Targeted source and dist scans for `/__*`, hosted writes, collectors, analytics, remote loading, private paths, credential-shaped strings, and raw telemetry indicators.

### Edge Cases

* Browser e2e unavailable because Chromium is missing.
* Full test pass but public-demo Pages build fails.
* Public-demo route smoke passes desktop but fails mobile overflow or no-bridge checks.
* Playthrough exits 0 with active capped runs that need careful caveat wording.
* All blockers fixed but product decision still requires a named condition.
* New scan finding changes the security/GDPR posture from the prior clean record.

***

## 10. Dependencies

### Other Sessions

* Depends on: `phase34-session01-characterization-test-harness`, `phase34-session02-accessibility-and-compact-input`, `phase34-session03-simulation-correctness-and-scenario-gate`, `phase34-session04-renderer-lifecycle-and-robustness`, `phase34-session05-runtime-api-ownership`, `phase34-session06-persistence-schema-contracts`, and `phase34-session07-render-performance-and-audio-docs`.
* Depended by: Phase Transition `audit` workflow after `updateprd` completes Phase 34.

***

## Next Steps

Run the `implement` workflow step to begin implementation.


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase34-session08-default-enablement-evidence-closeout/spec.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.