> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase34-session03-simulation-correctness-and-scenario-gate/code-review.md).

# Code Review and Repair Report

**Session ID**: `phase34-session03-simulation-correctness-and-scenario-gate` **Reviewed**: 2026-06-26 **Scope**: All uncommitted changes in the working tree **Result**: RESOLVED

## Review Surface

**Files reviewed** (all uncommitted changes):

* `.spec_system/state.json` - tracked-modified
* `.spec_system/specs/phase34-session03-simulation-correctness-and-scenario-gate/spec.md` - untracked
* `.spec_system/specs/phase34-session03-simulation-correctness-and-scenario-gate/tasks.md` - untracked
* `.spec_system/specs/phase34-session03-simulation-correctness-and-scenario-gate/implementation-notes.md` - untracked
* `.spec_system/specs/phase34-session03-simulation-correctness-and-scenario-gate/code-review.md` - untracked
* `docs/extensions/ai-rogue/playtest-notes.md` - tracked-modified
* `docs/extensions/ai-rogue/run-loop-rebuild-notes.md` - tracked-modified
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/__tests__/client.test.tsx` - tracked-modified
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/__tests__/runtime-canvas.test.tsx` - tracked-modified
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/runtime/__tests__/simulation.test.ts` - tracked-modified
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/runtime/__tests__/status-expanded.test.ts` - tracked-modified
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/runtime/index.ts` - tracked-modified
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/runtime/renderer.ts` - tracked-modified
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/runtime/simulation.ts` - tracked-modified
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/runtime/types.ts` - tracked-modified
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/views/play-view.tsx` - tracked-modified
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/views/runtime-canvas.tsx` - tracked-modified
* `src/routes/__tests__/extensions-routes.test.tsx` - tracked-modified
* `tests/e2e/ai-rogue-runtime.spec.ts` - tracked-modified

**Inventory commands**: `git status`, `git diff HEAD`, `git diff --cached`, `git ls-files --others --exclude-standard`

## Findings by Severity

### Critical

None.

### High

None.

### Medium

None.

### Low

* `docs/extensions/ai-rogue/run-loop-rebuild-notes.md:78` - The Phase 34 note was inserted before the existing Human fun verdict and Audio rows, leaving those rows outside the Markdown table. Fix: moved both rows back into the Rebuild Status table, kept the Phase 34 note as prose after the table, and ran Prettier plus markdownlint on the repaired file. Status: FIXED
* `src/extensions/ai-rogue/views/play-view.tsx:324` - Validation found visible route/runtime diagnostic copy on the normal Play surface. Fix: changed the panel and signal wording to product-facing labels (`Run setup`, `Save profile`, `Adventure data`, `Input mode`, `Grid view`, `Art pack`) and updated the two tests that asserted the old copy. Status: FIXED

## Assumptions and Deliberate Non-Fixes

* Lethal turn-start loss still clears `pendingThreats` through the existing terminal-state finalization path. Evidence: `finalizePlayerTurn` already clears pending threats whenever the resulting run status is not `active`, and the lethal path emits only `status,loss` with no Signal Jammer, kill reward, enemy turn, attack, heal, reveal, movement, or protocol-consumption events. Assumption: the session requirement forbids action-specific threat clearing, not terminal-state cleanup after the run is lost. No code change was made.

## Behavior Changes

* Reviewed session behavior changes: lethal turn-start status now produces the same immediate loss/no-action outcome for Movement, Strike, Surge, and Protocol, and Play route `scenario=combat` query input no longer selects the combat fixture.
* Review repair behavior changes: documentation table structure was repaired, and validation changed Play route copy only; no simulation or scenario-gating behavior changed during review repair.

## Verification

* Tests: `bun run test -- src/extensions/ai-rogue src/routes/__tests__/extensions-routes.test.tsx` - PASS - 43 files and 297 tests passed.
* Tests: `bunx playwright test tests/e2e/ai-rogue-runtime.spec.ts` - PASS - 9 tests passed.
* Tests: `bun run test -- src/extensions/ai-rogue/__tests__/client.test.tsx src/routes/__tests__/extensions-routes.test.tsx` - PASS - 2 files and 45 tests passed after the validation copy repair.
* Tests: `bunx markdownlint docs/extensions/ai-rogue/run-loop-rebuild-notes.md` - PASS.
* Type checker: `bun run typecheck` - PASS.
* Linter: `bun run lint` - PASS.
* Formatter: `bun run format:check` - PASS.
* Diff hygiene: `git diff HEAD --check` - PASS.
* ASCII/LF: changed and untracked review-surface files - PASS - 19 files scanned.
* Security/product-surface spot check: no new `fetch`, `/__` bridge call, `sendBeacon`, analytics, collector, or hosted-write matches in touched production runtime/view files.
* Scenario query spot check: `scenario=combat` remains only in historical audit findings and the e2e ignored-query regression.
* Product-surface spot check: visible Play route copy no longer includes validation-blocking route/runtime diagnostic labels; runtime event telemetry remains in a hidden, `aria-hidden` test surface.
* Final diff re-read: no remaining issues found.

## Summary

1. Reviewed 19 uncommitted files across AI Rogue simulation, runtime scenario gating, tests, documentation, state, and session artifacts.
2. Findings: 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, 2 low; both low issues were fixed.
3. Deliberately did not change terminal loss pending-threat cleanup because it is existing finalization behavior and not action-specific threat clearing.
4. Verification passed for focused unit tests, dedicated browser tests, markdownlint, typecheck, lint, format, diff hygiene, ASCII/LF, and runtime-boundary spot checks.


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase34-session03-simulation-correctness-and-scenario-gate/code-review.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.