> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase25-session04-multi-goal-authoring-preview-ui/security-compliance.md).

# Security Compliance Review

**Session ID**: `phase25-session04-multi-goal-authoring-preview-ui` **Date**: 2026-06-08 **Status**: PASS

***

## Scope

This review covers manual multi-goal authoring, optimized preview rendering, preview commit/discard behavior, admin write gating, query invalidation, and bounded feedback in Mission Control.

## Initial Security Position

* Reads must continue through `useHermes`.
* Writes must continue through `useHermesAdmin`.
* Demo, offline, token-failure, and admin-disabled gates must remain explicit.
* Optimize must not persist or activate a mission until the operator commits.
* Error feedback must redact local paths, bearer tokens, auth headers, and token-like values.

## Final Review

### Result

PASS. The session preserves the existing Mission Control security posture while adding manual multi-goal authoring and explicit optimized preview commit.

### Findings

| Area                         | Status | Notes                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| ---------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Admin gate                   | PASS   | Manual create and preview commit remain gated by `canEdit` and `useHermesAdmin`; demo, offline, token-failure, and admin-disabled states keep writes unavailable.                        |
| Preview persistence boundary | PASS   | Optimize stores a local candidate and does not invalidate or activate a mission until commit. Discard clears local state without bridge writes.                                          |
| Query refresh boundary       | PASS   | Mission refresh still happens through TanStack Query invalidation; no raw mission bridge fetch or local active-mission shortcut was added.                                               |
| Input validation             | PASS   | Manual drafts are schema-checked before conversion to `HermesMissionCreateRequest`, including goal count, actors, deadline bounds, required row fields, and optional full prompt length. |
| Duplicate writes             | PASS   | Create and commit controls are disabled while pending and still flow through the admin hook in-flight guard.                                                                             |
| Error boundaries             | PASS   | New create, optimize, and commit failures use existing bounded redaction for local paths, bearer tokens, auth headers, and token-like values.                                            |
| Data exposure                | PASS   | Preview rendering uses normalized mission summaries and bounded display helpers; no new secret, token, local path, or raw private file content is introduced.                            |

### BQC Summary

* Resource cleanup: N/A; no timers, subscriptions, sockets, or external resources were introduced.
* Duplicate action prevention: PASS; create and commit pending states are guarded by UI disabled states and admin hook mutation guards.
* State freshness on re-entry: PASS; manual, optimize, import, and preview state reset on close or presentation/demo re-entry.
* Trust boundary enforcement: PASS; manual draft input is validated before admin write payload conversion.
* Failure path completeness: PASS; validation, optimize, create, import, commit, tick, and clear failures remain caller-visible.
* Contract alignment: PASS; manual and import authoring share mission goal and deadline limits, and tests assert payload/preview contracts.
* Error information boundaries: PASS; commit error tests verify redaction.
* Accessibility and platform compliance: PASS; row controls and preview actions have explicit labels, disabled states, and focus handling for added rows.

### Validation Evidence

* `bun run typecheck` passed.
* `bun run lint` passed.
* `bunx vitest run src/lib/__tests__/hermes-mission-authoring.test.ts src/components/hermes/__tests__/hermes-mission-control.test.tsx` passed: 2 files, 24 tests.
* `git diff --check` passed.
* ASCII and LF checks passed for touched session files.


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://ai-os-and-trend-finder.gitbook.io/ai-os-and-trend-finder-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase25-session04-multi-goal-authoring-preview-ui/security-compliance.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.